Google's firing of anti-diversity memo author was legal: US Labour board

Google did not violate labour laws when it fired James Damore, a former employee who was ousted from the company last year for criticising the tech giant for its diversity policy, according to the federal agency that oversees employment practices.
 
"Employers must be permitted to 'nip in the bud' the kinds of employee conduct that could lead to a 'hostile workplace,'" a lawyer with the US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) wrote in an agency memorandum made public this week, CNET reported.
 
Damore's memo, titled "Google's Ideological Echo Chamber", claims that when it comes to technology, there is a biological difference between men and women.
 
Before his firing, Damore had filed a complaint with the NLRB that charged Google with "misrepresenting and shaming me in order to silence my complaints".
 
But the NLRB lawyer said Google fired the computer engineer not for expressing dissenting views or criticism, but over "unprotected discriminatory statements" in his memo, which he had posted to internal discussion forums at the tech giant.
 
"Employers have a strong interest in promoting diversity and encouraging employees across diverse demographic groups to thrive in their workplaces," attorney Jayme Sophir wrote in the memorandum.
 
"The statements regarding biological differences between the sexes were so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive as to be unprotected," Sophir stated.
 
Damore withdrew the NLRB complaint last month to focus on a lawsuit against Google. In his lawsuit filed in a California court, Damore said that Google "ostracised, belittled and punished" him and a fellow plaintiff.
 
He added that he and others who share his views at Google long have been "singled out, mistreated, and systematically punished and terminated from Google, in violation of their legal rights".
 
Google CEO Sundar Pichai had said he did not regret firing Damore. When asked about Google's decision to fire Damore during an interview with MSNBC last month, Pichai said: "I don't regret it. It was the right decision. The last thing we do when we make decisions like this is to look at it with a political lens."
Shoot

Trending News

Why Amazon’s Flipkart bid is just not high enough

Selling without MRP, expiry dates to cost etailers

TCS hits $100Bn market cap: A new phase for India Inc?

Snapdeal posts Rs 4,647 crore net loss in 2016-17

Flipkart-Walmart deal: What it means for the etailer and the whole industry

NCLAT stays CCI penalty of Rs 136cr on Google in search bias case

Walmart may rope in Google parent Alphabet for the Flipkart deal

Internet shutdown cost Indian economy $3 billion from 2012-17: Study

Flipkart and Amazon plan mega summer sales in May

International sales now account for 48% of Twitter's revenues

70% of mobile phones buyers in India opt for non-cash payments

Amazon India expects groceries & household products to account for 50% of business in 5 yrs

India to come out with a E-commerce policy framework in 6 months

Online learning platform Career Anna raises Rs 3 Cr funding

Wal-Mart will offer to buy up to 86% of Flipkart

Agritech startups Sabziwala and LivLush merge their business under new entity Kamatan

Avail Finance lands $17.2M from Matrix Partners & Ola, Freecharge and Flipkart founders

RBI suggests tax sops, self-regulation to build fintech space

Swiggy hires new CEO for its Access Service, gets new CFO

Logistics company Delhivery registers 44% increase in FY17 revenues

WeWork to acquire one of the oldest social networks, Meetup

Qualcomm rejects Broadcom's $103 billion offer

EasyRewardz gets $2 million Series-A funding

'Anemic' iPhone 8 demand drags Apple shares lower

Lending platform Lenden Club gets Rs 3.5cr in Equity Investment

On festive sales, Flipkart says 65% clients from Tier-II cities