Flipkart's tax math is leaving income tax sleuths at their wit's end

Flipkart’s paradoxical status as India’s most-valuable but loss-making internet company may have landed it in the tax soup it is in now.
The income-tax department views Flipkart as an anomaly since the company has been making losses while its valuation has been rising, said a senior tax official familiar with the details of the department’s case against Flipkart.
“The valuation going up is the problem,” the official told ET, requesting anonymity “Flipkart wants to build its brand and create long-term value. But they want to show (expenses towards this) under revenues. They are claiming losses year after year but their valuation is going up.”
The country’s largest online marketplace in December lost an appeal against the tax department’s ruling that it reclassify its marketing expenditure and discounts as capital expenditure. Flipkart, Amazon India, and many other e-commerce marketplaces deduct marketing expenditure and discounts from revenue, inevitably resulting in losses that aren’t liable to be taxed.
“For Flipkart, the whole survival is on the marketplace, where they make commissions from sellers. If they make a commission of Rs 1 on a Rs 100 mug, they spend Rs 2 or Rs 3 to advertise that product and build their brand,” the tax official said.
The tax department contends that this is not a cost but capital expenditure that should be spread over 4-10 years, which could result in online marketplaces being deemed profitable and liable to pay 30% tax, ET reported on Monday. Flipkart is currently valued at about $11.6 billion, down from a peak of $15.2 billion in 2016 after a series of markdowns by mutual funds.
The company registered marketing expenses of Rs 1,086 crore and a loss of Rs 5,223 crore in the fiscal year 2015-16. An ET analysis of marketing costs and losses of leading internet companies in India shows that most of them have losses much higher than the costs incurred on marketing and discounting. This means that even if the expenses are not deducted from revenues, the companies will not be immediately profitable.
Only One97 Communications, the parent company of Paytm, had its marketing costs almost similar to that of its losses for fiscal 2016-17. Flipkart did not respond to queries on the matter. Other e-commerce entrepreneurs ET reached out to declined comment.
E-commerce industry members and tax experts have termed the tax department’s ruling as unconstitutional, stating that the law does not provide for marketing expenses to be considered as capital expenditure. “There is no precedent to this case,” said Vaibhav Parikh, a corporate lawyer at law firm Nishith Desai Associates. “If the I-T department is bringing a new provision, it will impact not only Flipkart but all retail companies. This may also impact investor interest.”
The software industry body Nasscom had raised this issue as part of its recommendation for the 2017-18 Union Budget, seeking for marketing costs to be classified as deductible expenses in the year in which they are incurred. The issue was not considered in the Budget.
“It is possible the income tax department is eyeing a portion of the billion+ dollars in funding that comes into this sector, but let’s not kill the golden goose before it grows up,” said Prasanto K Roy, vice president, Nasscom Internet Council.
The ruling could potentially affect e-commerce companies investing in marketing and customer acquisition via discounts, cashbacks, and other promotions, or via discounted logistics or services to their seller partners, Roy said.
Tax experts say the ruling is likely to fall through in a higher court. Flipkart is likely to challenge the order at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), ET reported on Monday.
“The stand of the tax department to treat the discounts and marketing expenses as capital expenditure is not right from a business prudence and accounting perspective,” said TC Meenakshisundaram, MD, IDG Ventures India Advisors, an investor in Flipkart. “Such treatment can’t be done for every retail organisation that gives 70% off (as discounts).”

Trending News

Why Amazon’s Flipkart bid is just not high enough

Selling without MRP, expiry dates to cost etailers

TCS hits $100Bn market cap: A new phase for India Inc?

Snapdeal posts Rs 4,647 crore net loss in 2016-17

Flipkart-Walmart deal: What it means for the etailer and the whole industry

NCLAT stays CCI penalty of Rs 136cr on Google in search bias case

Walmart may rope in Google parent Alphabet for the Flipkart deal

Internet shutdown cost Indian economy $3 billion from 2012-17: Study

Flipkart and Amazon plan mega summer sales in May

International sales now account for 48% of Twitter's revenues

70% of mobile phones buyers in India opt for non-cash payments

Amazon India expects groceries & household products to account for 50% of business in 5 yrs

India to come out with a E-commerce policy framework in 6 months

Online learning platform Career Anna raises Rs 3 Cr funding

Wal-Mart will offer to buy up to 86% of Flipkart

Agritech startups Sabziwala and LivLush merge their business under new entity Kamatan

Avail Finance lands $17.2M from Matrix Partners & Ola, Freecharge and Flipkart founders

RBI suggests tax sops, self-regulation to build fintech space

Swiggy hires new CEO for its Access Service, gets new CFO

Logistics company Delhivery registers 44% increase in FY17 revenues

WeWork to acquire one of the oldest social networks, Meetup

Qualcomm rejects Broadcom's $103 billion offer

EasyRewardz gets $2 million Series-A funding

'Anemic' iPhone 8 demand drags Apple shares lower

Lending platform Lenden Club gets Rs 3.5cr in Equity Investment

On festive sales, Flipkart says 65% clients from Tier-II cities